Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'diritto marittimo'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Categories

  • Chi siamo
  • Articoli
  • Bollettino
  • Bibliografia navale
  • Recensioni
  • News

Forums

  • AIDMEN: Sezione Riservata - Members Only
  • Attività Associative - Association Activities
    • Attività sociali
  • Discussione Generale - General Talk
    • Condizioni d'uso del Forum - Forum Rules
    • Presentazioni e Benvenuto ai Nuovi Iscritti - New Members Introduction
    • Fuori Discussione - Off Topic
    • Quiz e Caccia all'Errore - Quiz and Error Hunt
  • Discussioni a Tema - Threaded Discussions
    • Album Fotografico - Photo Gallery
    • Storia - History
    • Marine Militari - Navies
    • Navi Mercantili e Navi da Crociera - Merchant Ships and Cruise Ships
    • Modellismo - Modelling
    • Collezionismo - Collecting
    • Subacquea - Diving
  • Editoria, Mostre, Convegni e Musei - Publishing, Exhibitions, Conventions and Museums
    • Recensioni - Reviews
    • Mostre, Convegni e Musei - Exhibitions, Conventions and Museums

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


MSN


Website URL


Yahoo


Skype


Location


Interests


Last name


Real name

Found 1 result

  1. Vi segnalo sul n.1-2/2022 della rivista the Legal history review un interessante articolo su una vicenda di era moderna (1599) sulla cattura della nave veneziana PONTE, "beccata" con bandiera portoghese di cortesia a commerciare tra Cadice e il Brasile, dove il monopolio dei traffici era per l'appunto portoghese. Ps. per responsabilità vicaria si intende responsabilità legale per azioni illecite commesse da qualcun altro. vi metto tutti i riferimenti e l'abstract Lubbers T. The capture of the Ponte: the development of vicarious liability of shipowners and its limitation in Roman-Dutch law. Legal History Review. 2022;90(1/2):1-45. doi:10.1163/15718190-20220012 Summary: In 1599, Dutch privateer Melchior van den Kerckhoven unlawfully captured the Venetian merchantman Ponte , which resulted in extensive legal proceedings before the Supreme Court of Holland, Zeeland and West-Friesland. The Ponte case soon became the centrepiece for discussions about vicarious liability of shipowners for unlawful acts of their shipmasters, and – more importantly – about limitation of this liability to (the value of) their ship and cargo. Within these discussions, a secondary role was reserved for the case arising from the capture of the French ship Levrette by a Dutch merchantman in 1610. Based on extensive archival research, the present article offers a detailed reconstruction of the facts and proceedings of the Ponte and the Levrette case, and sets out how these cases were employed by Roman-Dutch lawyers to give shape to limited liability of shipowners for unlawful acts of their shipmaster.
×
×
  • Create New...